The status of field teams in the construction industry

Daily life, constraints and efficiency: what field teams are really experiencing in 2026

In the construction industry, Digital technology connects people.

More than in all the other sectors studied, construction field teams do not see digital technology as a simple productivity tool. They find something rarer there: a link.

They consider that digital technology strengthens the link with colleagues.

vs 40% on average across all sectors. Construction is the only sector where digital technology is perceived as a tool for connecting people, not just productivity.

↑ +18 pts vs the national average

58%

The construction industry is talking
louder than the others.

On all indicators of meaning, exchange and pressure, construction field teams consistently stand out from the average.

61%

Understand the “what” AND the “why”

The sector where meaning flows best.

↑ +13 pts vs average (48%).

51%

Peer learning is the #1 driver.

Consider the exchange “very useful”

↑ +17 pts vs average (34%).

64%

Want more time

The time pressure is maximum.

↑ +16 pts vs the average.

41%

Want more exchanges between colleagues

The collective need is massive.

+19 pts vs average (22%).

The land is under
permanent pressure.

Workload, lack of staff, poor internal communication. The construction industry is accumulating structural tensions that far exceed the national average.

High workload
40%
↑ +10 pts
36%
↑ +7 pts
Lack of staff
Lack of recognition
25%
↓ -9 pts
Poor internal communication
21%
↑ +4 pts
Lack of time
18%
↓ -3 pts
Difficult clients/beneficiaries
17%
↓ -7 pts
79%
understand the instructions
vs 84% on the national average (-5 pts)

The “what”,
Without the “why”

Understand the what AND the why
61%
vs 48%
on average (+13 pts)
Understand the what BUT NOT the why
18%
vs 36%
on average (-18 pts)

53%

vs 61% on average

Feel a disconnect between what they are asked and what they can actually do

the BTP is below the average on this indicator,
but the problem remains structural.

why  
does this gap exist?

The reasons for the lag.

Lack of time
55%
↑ +2 pts
Difficult goals
50%
↑ +18 pts
Lack of training
25%
↑ +5 pts
Lack of resources/Tools
29%
↑ +3 pts
Field constraints ignored
26%
↓ -14 pts
15%
↓ -8 pts
Complicated procedures

What would help them truly

When asked what would really change their daily lives, the answers from the construction industry are clear and out of step with the average. Time and the collective dominate.

More time/less pressure
64%
↑ +16 pts
More colleague exchanges
41%
↑ +19 pts
Tools adapted to the field
38%
↑ +5 pts
Practical business training
17%
↓ -9 pts
Understand the meaning and priorities
16%
↓ -7 pts
Construction teams
Construction site

“On a construction site, it is through exchanges that we learn. Digital technology should serve that, not replace it.”

Verbatim terrain — Construction sector & Construction

The gesture and the visual
above all.

The visual (diagram, step-by-step) exploded by 31% (+138% vs average). The written text is marginal (10%).

Construction site
Field demonstration
36%
+0 pts
Diagram/step-by-step
31%
↑ +18 pts
Oral explanation
13%
↓ -7 pts
Short video
10%
+0 pts
Written text
10%
↓ -11 pts
Key insight: Demonstration + diagram = 67% of preferences. Construction learns through gestures and visuals, +138% vs the average for the diagram alone.
Two field employees

The good news?

We have the solution. And we can show it to you.

Request a demo

How was this study done

Beedeez study × IFOP 2026

1148
field workers interviewed in France
6
key sectors studied in depth
Quotas
gender, age, CSP, management, sector
On line
self-administered questionnaire, Jan—Feb 2026